\[\begin{split}\newcommand{\as}{\kw{as}} \newcommand{\case}{\kw{case}} \newcommand{\cons}{\textsf{cons}} \newcommand{\consf}{\textsf{consf}} \newcommand{\emptyf}{\textsf{emptyf}} \newcommand{\End}{\kw{End}} \newcommand{\kwend}{\kw{end}} \newcommand{\even}{\textsf{even}} \newcommand{\evenO}{\textsf{even}_\textsf{O}} \newcommand{\evenS}{\textsf{even}_\textsf{S}} \newcommand{\Fix}{\kw{Fix}} \newcommand{\fix}{\kw{fix}} \newcommand{\for}{\textsf{for}} \newcommand{\forest}{\textsf{forest}} \newcommand{\Functor}{\kw{Functor}} \newcommand{\In}{\kw{in}} \newcommand{\ind}[3]{\kw{Ind}~[#1]\left(#2\mathrm{~:=~}#3\right)} \newcommand{\Indp}[4]{\kw{Ind}_{#4}[#1](#2:=#3)} \newcommand{\Indpstr}[5]{\kw{Ind}_{#4}[#1](#2:=#3)/{#5}} \newcommand{\injective}{\kw{injective}} \newcommand{\kw}[1]{\textsf{#1}} \newcommand{\length}{\textsf{length}} \newcommand{\letin}[3]{\kw{let}~#1:=#2~\kw{in}~#3} \newcommand{\List}{\textsf{list}} \newcommand{\lra}{\longrightarrow} \newcommand{\Match}{\kw{match}} \newcommand{\Mod}[3]{{\kw{Mod}}({#1}:{#2}\,\zeroone{:={#3}})} \newcommand{\ModImp}[3]{{\kw{Mod}}({#1}:{#2}:={#3})} \newcommand{\ModA}[2]{{\kw{ModA}}({#1}=={#2})} \newcommand{\ModS}[2]{{\kw{Mod}}({#1}:{#2})} \newcommand{\ModType}[2]{{\kw{ModType}}({#1}:={#2})} \newcommand{\mto}{.\;} \newcommand{\nat}{\textsf{nat}} \newcommand{\Nil}{\textsf{nil}} \newcommand{\nilhl}{\textsf{nil\_hl}} \newcommand{\nO}{\textsf{O}} \newcommand{\node}{\textsf{node}} \newcommand{\nS}{\textsf{S}} \newcommand{\odd}{\textsf{odd}} \newcommand{\oddS}{\textsf{odd}_\textsf{S}} \newcommand{\ovl}[1]{\overline{#1}} \newcommand{\Pair}{\textsf{pair}} \newcommand{\plus}{\mathsf{plus}} \newcommand{\SProp}{\textsf{SProp}} \newcommand{\Prop}{\textsf{Prop}} \newcommand{\return}{\kw{return}} \newcommand{\Set}{\textsf{Set}} \newcommand{\Sort}{\mathcal{S}} \newcommand{\Str}{\textsf{Stream}} \newcommand{\Struct}{\kw{Struct}} \newcommand{\subst}[3]{#1\{#2/#3\}} \newcommand{\tl}{\textsf{tl}} \newcommand{\tree}{\textsf{tree}} \newcommand{\trii}{\triangleright_\iota} \newcommand{\Type}{\textsf{Type}} \newcommand{\WEV}[3]{\mbox{$#1[] \vdash #2 \lra #3$}} \newcommand{\WEVT}[3]{\mbox{$#1[] \vdash #2 \lra$}\\ \mbox{$ #3$}} \newcommand{\WF}[2]{{\mathcal{W\!F}}(#1)[#2]} \newcommand{\WFE}[1]{\WF{E}{#1}} \newcommand{\WFT}[2]{#1[] \vdash {\mathcal{W\!F}}(#2)} \newcommand{\WFTWOLINES}[2]{{\mathcal{W\!F}}\begin{array}{l}(#1)\\\mbox{}[{#2}]\end{array}} \newcommand{\with}{\kw{with}} \newcommand{\WS}[3]{#1[] \vdash #2 <: #3} \newcommand{\WSE}[2]{\WS{E}{#1}{#2}} \newcommand{\WT}[4]{#1[#2] \vdash #3 : #4} \newcommand{\WTE}[3]{\WT{E}{#1}{#2}{#3}} \newcommand{\WTEG}[2]{\WTE{\Gamma}{#1}{#2}} \newcommand{\WTM}[3]{\WT{#1}{}{#2}{#3}} \newcommand{\zeroone}[1]{[{#1}]} \end{split}\]

# Definitions

## Let-in definitions

term_let`::=`let name : type? := term in term`````|`let name binder+ : type? := term in term`````|`destructuring_let``

`let ident := term1 in term2` represents the local binding of the variable `ident` to the value `term1` in `term2`.

`let ident binder+ := term1 in term2` is an abbreviation for `let ident := fun binder+ => term1 in term2`.

See also

Extensions of the `let ... in ...` syntax are described in Irrefutable patterns: the destructuring let variants.

## Type cast

term_cast`::=`term10 : type`````|`term10 <: type`````|`term10 <<: type``

The expression `term10 : type` is a type cast expression. It enforces the type of `term10` to be `type`.

`term10 <: type` specifies that the virtual machine will be used to type check that `term10` has type `type` (see `vm_compute`).

`term10 <<: type` specifies that compilation to OCaml will be used to type check that `term10` has type `type` (see `native_compute`).

## Top-level definitions

Definitions extend the global environment by associating names to terms. A definition can be seen as a way to give a meaning to a name or as a way to abbreviate a term. In any case, the name can later be replaced at any time by its definition.

The operation of unfolding a name into its definition is called delta-reduction. A definition is accepted by the system if and only if the defined term is well-typed in the current context of the definition and if the name is not already used. The name defined by the definition is called a constant and the term it refers to is its body. A definition has a type, which is the type of its body.

A formal presentation of constants and environments is given in Section Typing rules.

Command Definition​Example ident_decl def_body
  def_body`::=`binder* : type? := reduce? term`````|`binder* : type``reduce`::=`Eval red_expr in``

  These commands bind `term` to the name `ident` in the global environment, provided that `term` is well-typed. They can take the `local` attribute, which makes the defined `ident` accessible by `Import` and its variants only through their fully qualified names. If `reduce` is present then `ident` is bound to the result of the specified computation on `term`.

  These commands also support the `universes(polymorphic)`, `program` (see Program Definition), `canonical`, `bypass_check(universes)`, `bypass_check(guard)`, and `using` attributes.

  If `term` is omitted, `type` is required and Coq enters proof mode. This can be used to define a term incrementally, in particular by relying on the `refine` tactic. In this case, the proof should be terminated with `Defined` in order to define a constant for which the computational behavior is relevant. See Entering and exiting proof mode.

  The form `Definition ident : type := term` checks that the type of `term` is definitionally equal to `type`, and registers `ident` as being of type `type`, and bound to value `term`.

  The form `Definition ident binder* : type := term` is equivalent to `Definition ident : forall binder*, type := fun binder* => term`.

  See also

  `Opaque`, `Transparent`, `unfold`.

  Error ident already exists.
  Error The term term has type type while it is expected to have type type'.

## Assertions and proofs

An assertion states a proposition (or a type) for which the proof (or an inhabitant of the type) is interactively built using tactics. Assertions cause Coq to enter proof mode (see Proof mode). Common tactics are described in the Basic proof writing chapter. The basic assertion command is:

Command thm_token ident_decl binder* : type with ident_decl binder* : type*
  thm_token`::=`Theorem`````|`Lemma`````|`Fact`````|`Remark`````|`Corollary`````|`Proposition`````|`Property``

  After the statement is asserted, Coq needs a proof. Once a proof of `type` under the assumptions represented by `binder`s is given and validated, the proof is generalized into a proof of `forall binder*, type` and the theorem is bound to the name `ident` in the global environment.

  These commands accept the `program` attribute. See Program Lemma.

  Forms using the `with` clause are useful for theorems that are proved by simultaneous induction over a mutually inductive assumption, or that assert mutually dependent statements in some mutual coinductive type. It is equivalent to `Fixpoint` or `CoFixpoint` but using tactics to build the proof of the statements (or the body of the specification, depending on the point of view). The inductive or coinductive types on which the induction or coinduction has to be done is assumed to be unambiguous and is guessed by the system.

  Like in a `Fixpoint` or `CoFixpoint` definition, the induction hypotheses have to be used on structurally smaller arguments (for a `Fixpoint`) or be guarded by a constructor (for a `CoFixpoint`). The verification that recursive proof arguments are correct is done only at the time of registering the lemma in the global environment. To know if the use of induction hypotheses is correct at some time of the interactive development of a proof, use the command `Guarded`.

  This command accepts the `bypass_check(universes)`, `bypass_check(guard)`, and `using` attributes.

  Error The term term has type type which should be Set, Prop or Type.
  Error ident already exists.

    The name you provided is already defined. You have then to choose another name.

  Error Nested proofs are discouraged and not allowed by default. This error probably means that you forgot to close the last "Proof." with "Qed." or "Defined.". If you really intended to use nested proofs, you can do so by turning the "Nested Proofs Allowed" flag on.

    You are asserting a new statement when you're already in proof mode. This feature, called nested proofs, is disabled by default. To activate it, turn the `Nested Proofs Allowed` flag on.

Proofs start with the keyword `Proof`. Then Coq enters the proof mode until the proof is completed. In proof mode, the user primarily enters tactics (see Basic proof writing). The user may also enter commands to manage the proof mode (see Proof mode).

When the proof is complete, use the `Qed` command so the kernel verifies the proof and adds it to the global environment.

Note

1. Several statements can be simultaneously asserted provided the `Nested Proofs Allowed` flag was turned on.

2. Not only other assertions but any command can be given while in the process of proving a given assertion. In this case, the command is understood as if it would have been given before the statements still to be proved. Nonetheless, this practice is discouraged and may stop working in future versions.

3. Proofs ended by `Qed` are declared opaque. Their content cannot be unfolded (see Applying conversion rules), thus realizing some form of proof-irrelevance. Proofs that end with `Defined` can be unfolded.

4. `Proof` is recommended but can currently be omitted. On the opposite side, `Qed` (or `Defined`) is mandatory to validate a proof.

5. One can also use `Admitted` in place of `Qed` to turn the current asserted statement into an axiom and exit proof mode.

Other versions v: 8.16.1

Versions
  dev
  stable
  8.16
  8.15
  8.14
  8.13
  8.12
  8.11
  8.10
  8.9
  8.8
  8.7
  8.6
  8.5
  8.4
  8.3
  8.2
  8.1
  8.0

Downloads
  PDF